MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1971652968 · doi:10.1159/000067887

Is the Sampling Site along the Umbilical Artery Significant?

2002· article· en· W1971652968 on OpenAlexaff
Sharon Perlman, Ran D. Goldman, Hila Maatuk, Eric S. Shinwell, Isaac Blickstein

Bibliographic record

VenueGynecologic and Obstetric Investigation · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal and fetal brain pathology
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersHebrew University of Jerusalem
KeywordsUmbilical arteryUmbilical cordPlacentaFetusMedicineSampling (signal processing)Blood samplingArteryObstetricsArterial bloodAnatomySurgeryPregnancyAnesthesiaBiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of umbilical blood sampling is to obtain accurate reflection of fetal acid-base status at birth. The site along the umbilical artery from which blood should be sampled postpartum was not specified. We evaluated if blood gases and pH values from three sampling sites along the umbilical artery are different. After defining the range of intraobserver (method) variability, blood pO(2), pCO(2), and pH were directly determined. The data showed consistent and significant increases in arterial pH and pCO(2) values and decreases in pO(2) values from near the fetal cord insertion to the placenta. The largest difference was noted between the fetal site and the placental plate and the smallest between the site near the placental cord insertion and the placental plate. We conclude that the site of cord blood sampling should be standardized and the umbilical artery should be sampled at a site nearest to the neonate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.029
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.029
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGynecologic and Obstetric InvestigationSame topicNeonatal and fetal brain pathologyFrench-language works237,207