MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1971679303 · doi:10.1016/s0736-0266(02)00061-x

Cryopreservation of intact human articular cartilage

2002· article· en· W1971679303 on OpenAlexafffund
Nadr M. Jomha, Guy Lavoie, Ken Muldrew, Norman S. Schachar, L.E. McGann

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Orthopaedic Research® · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Alberta Hospital
FundersUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsCryopreservationCryoprotectantCartilageDimethyl sulfoxideArticular cartilageChondrocyteChemistryAndrologyLiquid nitrogenBiomedical engineeringCell biologyAnatomyEmbryoBiologyOsteoarthritisPathologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Damaged articular cartilage (AC) impairs joint function and many treatment techniques are being investigated to determine their long term results. Successful cryopreservation of AC can provide a reliable source of intact matrix with viable chondrocytes to maintain the cartilage over long periods of time. This study investigated the application of an established cryopreservation protocol to determine the recovery of intact chondrocytes from human AC. Ten millimeter diameter osteochondral dowels were harvested from two human donors. The cryopreservation protocol was performed and the samples were rapidly warmed from varying experimental holding temperatures (-10, -20, -30, -40 degrees C), with and without plunging into liquid nitrogen, using 1 M dimethyl sulfoxide as cryoprotectant. The cartilage was stained with membrane integrity dyes and viewed under fluorescence microscopy. The percent of intact chondrocytes was compared to fresh controls. Low recovery of intact chondrocytes was recorded from all temperature levels with and without cryoprotectant. The results of this experiment demonstrated that the cryopreservation procedure used to achieve moderate success with intact sheep AC was not successful with intact human AC and further investigation is required.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Orthopaedic Research®Same topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207