MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1971839048 · doi:10.1117/12.707997

A simplified radio over fiber balanced system with suppression of both second- and third-order nonlinear distortions

2006· article· en· W1971839048 on OpenAlexaff
Biagio Masella, Xiupu Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Photonic Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFiber Bragg gratingOpticsPhysicsSubcarrier multiplexingSubcarrierBandwidth (computing)IntermodulationGroup delay and phase delayOptical fiberTelecommunicationsOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingComputer scienceChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a simplified radio over fiber balanced system that uses only one wavelength, optical modulator and fiber. In this balanced system the upper and lower sidebands produced by subcarrier modulation along with its optical carrier are separated before balanced photodetection. Optical time delays are introduced to one of the sidebands by means of two cascaded tunable nonlinearly chirped fiber Bragg gratings. The first nonlinearly chirped fiber Bragg grating produces relative time delay that has the following relationship τdelay ∝ 1/2f, while the second produces a relative time delay of τ delay ∝ 1/f. The first nonlinearly chirped fiber Bragg grating will have a large enough bandwidth and group velocity dispersion to introduce a relative time delay for the subcarrier and second order distortion, while the second will have the bandwidth and group velocity dispersion to introduce a different relative time delay for the third order distortion. The net effect of the relative time delays is to provide a phase shift of π for the subcarrier, second order distortion currents and a phase shift of 2π for the third order distortion current. Simulated results show a suppression of 2nd and 3rd harmonic distortion of 25.4 dB and 2.6 dB, respectively. In the case of 2nd and 3rd intermodulation distortion suppression of 33 dB and 20 dB, respectively have been reported. Simulation also shows that the power penalty improvement is approximately 2.5 dB for bit error rate of 10-9 for subcarrier at 10 and 35 GHz and relative intensity noise is suppressed by 3 dB.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicAdvanced Photonic Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207