Paleogeography of the Matapédia basin in the Gaspé Appalachians: initiation of the Gaspé Belt successor basin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Matapédia basin consists of the uppermost Ordovician lowermost Silurian deep-water, fine-grained carbonatesiliciclastic rocks of the Honorat (Garin Formation) and Matapédia groups (Pabos and White Head formations), the lower rock assemblage of the Gaspé Belt in the Gaspé Appalachians. Paleogeographic maps of eight time slices from the Caradocian to the Llandoverian are presented to better understand the tectonosedimentary evolution of the Matapédia basin. Deposition evolved from siliciclastic (Garin Fm.) to argillaceous limestones (Pabos Fm.), to limestones (White Head Fm.). The overall change from terrigenous (Garin Fm.) to limestone facies (White Head Fm.) reflects a change in the source area. Paleocurrent directions and composition of sandstones indicate an orogenic source area to the south for the Garin Formation, which is believed to be the inliers of the Humber and Dunnage zones in the southern Gaspé and New Brunswick Appalachians. Lime muds deposited by turbidity currents coming from the north suggest the Anticosti active carbonate platform as the source area for the White Head Formation. The Matapédia basin was filled from south to north. First deposits, the Garin Formation, occurred south of the Taconian thrust sheets (Humber Zone) and also south of the Grenville basement. This region was the domain of the Ordovician Iapetus Ocean (Dunnage Zone). The northern limit of the basin migrated northward during deposition of the Matapédia Group in AshgillianLlandoverian times and reached its actual northern limit at the very end of the Llandoverian (C 6 ), when siliciclastic facies of the lower Chaleurs Group were deposited.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".