Are long penis bones an adaption to high latitude snowy environments?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Animals adapted to high latitude environments typically live at relatively low densities and require large areas to acquire the requisites for successful reproduction. Also, the unpredictable distribution of energy across time and space, such as environmental seasonality, constrains the timing of mating and parturition and imposes limitations to reproductive strategies. For example, limited mobility due to snow accumulation may reduce mate encounters, and this selective pressure may have resulted in morphological adaptations to assess mate quality during serial encounters. We tested whether mammalian carnivores living in high latitude environments displayed greater use of copulatory competition via length of the penis bone or baculum, and whether females in such settings enhance competition among males via multi‐male matings. We then examined how baculum length may correlate with other reproductive adaptations in high latitude environments such as delayed implantation and induced ovulation. Statistical methods that account for phylogeny revealed that longer bacula occur in carnivores living in high latitude environments with greater snow accumulation, and that larger bacula is also associated with delayed implantation and multi‐male mating systems. In contrast, the smallest bacula were observed in polygynous species. Our results provide an example of the effects of ecology on the evolution of a secondary sexual character due to sexual selection. Selection pressures imposed by seasonality of resources and environmental conditions affecting locomotion may have led to sexual selection via mating systems for females, and counter morphological adaptations of long penis bones in males.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".