Effect of Nramp1 on bacterial replication and on maturation of Mycobacterium avium-containing phagosomes in bone marrow-derived mouse macrophages
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pathogenic mycobacteria prevent maturation of the phagosomes in which they reside inside macrophages and this is thought to be a major strategy allowing them to survive and multiply within macrophages. The molecular basis for this inhibition is only now beginning to emerge with the molecular characterization of the phagosome membrane enclosing these pathogens. We have used here several electron microscopy approaches in combination with counts of bacterial viability to analyse how expression of Nramp1 at the phagosomal membrane may influence survival of Mycobacterium avium and affect its ability to modulate the fusogenic properties of the phagosome in which it resides. The experiments were carried out in bone marrow-derived macrophages from wild-type 129sv (Nramp1(G169)) mice and from isogenic 129sv carrying a null mutation at Nramp1 (Nramp(1-/-)) following infection with a virulent strain of M. avium. We show here that Nramp1 expression has a bacteriostatic effect and that abrogation of Nramp1 restores the bacteria's capacity to replicate within macrophages. The combined analyses of the acquisition of endocytic contents markers delivered to early endosomes and/or lysosomes either prior to or after phagocytic uptake showed that in Nramp1-positive macrophages, M. avium was unable to prevent phagosome maturation and fusion with lysosomes but that in Nramp1-negative macrophages this capacity was restored. Several hypotheses are proposed to explain how Nramp1 could affect survival of M. avium. We also propose how the present observations could relate to the model according to which mycobacteria can prevent phagosome maturation by establishing a tight interaction with constituents of the phagosome membrane. Furthermore, these results show the importance of the choice of macrophages used as a model to study intracellular survival strategies of pathogens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".