Macrophages Inhibit Salmonella Typhimurium Replication through MEK/ERK Kinase and Phagocyte NADPH Oxidase Activities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Host responses during the later stages of Salmonella-macrophage interactions are critical to controlling infection but have not been well characterized. After 24 h of infection, nearly half of interferon-gamma-primed murine RAW 264.7 macrophage-like cells infected by Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium contained filamentous bacteria. Bacterial filamentation indicates a defect in completing replication and has been previously observed in bacteria responding to a variety of stresses. To understand whether macrophage gene expression was responsible for this effect on Salmonella Typhimurium replication, we used gene arrays to profile interferon-gamma-primed RAW 264.7 cell gene expression following infection. We observed an increase in MEK1 kinase mRNA at 8 h, an increase in MEK protein at 24 h, and measured phosphorylation of MEK's downstream target kinase, ERK1/2, throughout the 24-h infection period. Treatment of cells with MEK kinase inhibitors significantly reduced numbers of filamentous bacteria observed within macrophages after 24 h and increased the number of intracellular colony-forming units. Phagocyte NADPH oxidase inhibitors and antioxidants also significantly reduced bacterial filamentation. Either MEK kinase or phagocyte oxidase inhibitors could be added 4-8 h after infection and still significantly decrease bacterial filamentation. Oxidase activity appears to mediate bacterial filamentation in parallel to MEK kinase signaling, while inducible nitric-oxide synthase inhibitors had no significant effect on bacterial morphology. In summary, Salmonella Typhimurium infection of interferon-gamma-primed macrophages triggers a MEK kinase cascade at later infection times, and both MEK kinase and phagocyte NADPH oxidase activity impair bacterial replication. These two signaling pathways mediate a host bacteriostatic pathway and may play an important role in innate host defense against intracellular pathogens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".