MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972253620 · doi:10.1093/cid/cir228

Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in the Promoter of the Gene Encoding the Lipopolysaccharide Receptor CD14 Are Associated With Bacterial Diarrhea in US and Canadian Travelers to Mexico

2011· article· en· W1972253620 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mohamed A. Jamal, Herbert L. DuPont, Jose Flores, Himaja Palur, Parvathy Nair, Zhi-Dong Jiang, Dongchuan Guo, Jaime Belkind‐Gerson, Pablo C. Okhuysen

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Infectious Diseases · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTravel-related health issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Center for Research ResourcesNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesCenter for Clinical and Translational Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at HoustonNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsSingle-nucleotide polymorphismCD14DiarrheaLipopolysaccharideMedicineGeneTLR4MicrobiologyImmunologyBiologyGeneticsInflammationGenotypeInternal medicineImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Under normal conditions, the expression of CD14, which is the principal receptor for bacterial lipopolysaccharide, is down-regulated in the intestinal mucosa but increases in response to inflammatory stimuli. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether fecal CD14 levels increased in response to infection with diarrheagenic Escherichia coli and whether single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the CD14 gene were associated with an increased susceptibility to traveler's diarrhea (TD) in US visitors to Mexico. METHODS: Six SNPs located at the promoter, exon, and untranslated regions of CD14 were typed in a prospective cohort study of 1360 visitors to Mexico at risk for TD. Stools from visitors with TD were studied for enteric pathogens by culture, colony hybridization, and polymerase chain reaction. Fecal soluble CD14 (sCD14) was measured in a subgroup of 203 adults with diarrhea and 66 healthy controls by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: The minor allele frequencies for CD14 SNPs were significantly different among the various racial and ethnic groups studied. Two SNPs in the promoter region of CD14 (-159 C > T; rs2569190 and -4191 C > T; rs5744441) were found to be associated with TD in White visitors. The -159 TT genotype was associated with a higher risk for TD (Relative risk [RR], 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.38; P = .008), whereas individuals with the -4191 TT genotype were protected from infection (RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71-0.92; P = .006). Subjects with TD excreted higher levels of fecal CD14 than did healthy controls (33,480 pg/mL vs 6178 pg/mL; P < .02). Fecal sCD14 levels were higher in stool samples from visitors with TD and the -159 TT genotype than they were in visitors with the CC/CT genotypes (P = .02), and stool samples from subjects with the -4191 CC genotype had higher fecal sCD14 levels than did stool samples from visitors with the CT/TT (P = .005) genotype. In a multivariate analysis with haplotypes constructed with the 6 SNPs studied, subjects with the haplotype containing the -159 C and the -4191 T allele were less likely to acquire TD (P = .015). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that CD14 levels increase in response to bacterial diarrhea and that polymorphisms in the CD14 gene influence susceptibility to TD. Intestinal CD14 plays an important role in the innate immune response to enteric pathogens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.359
Threshold uncertainty score0.722

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Infectious DiseasesSame topicTravel-related health issuesFrench-language works237,207