Compensatory growth of three herbaceous perennial species: the effects of clipping and nutrient availability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The continuum of responses model (CRM) and the growth rate model (GRM) make conflicting predictions about the effects of soil nutrient availability on the resilience of plants to herbivory. A factorial experiment was conducted in the understory of the boreal forest to examine the effects of fertilization and simulated herbivory on the rate and amount of regrowth of three herbaceous perennial species (Achillea millefolium L., Festuca altaica Trin., and Mertensia paniculata (Aiton) G. Don.). As clipping intensity increases various measures of plant performance decrease. Fertilization reduces the ability of clipped plants to compensate for biomass loss regardless of species and growth measure. Under natural soil fertility levels in this study, M. paniculata is more likely to compensate for leaf loss than A. millefolium and F. altaica. Contrary to the findings of previous field studies, the compensatory responses of the three species studied were most consistent with the predictions of the GRM. Plants in our ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".