MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972271498 · doi:10.2118/100442-ms

Selective Removal of Water From Supercritical Natural Gas

2006· article· en· W1972271498 on OpenAlex
Ali Karimi, Majid Abedinzadegan Abdi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Gas Technology Symposium · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicnanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNatural gasPetroleum engineeringSubmarine pipelineSubseaSupercritical fluidEnvironmental scienceClathrate hydrateWet gasNatural-gas processingSubstitute natural gasFossil fuelHydrateWaste managementChemistrySyngasEngineeringMarine engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The demand for natural gas has pushed energy industries toward the discovery of remote offshore reservoirs. Consequently, new technologies have to be developed to efficiently produce and transport natural gas to consumption centers. Common design challenges in all gas processing methods for offshore applications are the compactness and reliability of process equipment. Water vapour is the most common impurity in natural gas mixtures. At very high gas pressures within the transportation systems hydrate can easily form even at relatively high temperatures. Gas dehydration or hydrate inhibition systems for offshore gas production/processing facilities should meet these requirements. It should also be noted that at certain pressure and composition conditions, the presence of heavy hydrocarbons (C2+) in natural gas increases pipeline flow capacity and improves compression efficiencies. Therefore, the development of a compact high pressure system capable of selectively removing water from high pressure natural gas streams without affecting the hydrocarbon content will be needed for especial applications and therefore it will be addressed in this paper. Most hydrate inhibition/water removal systems can only work below certain pressure conditions, are relatively large, and not selective towards water. Therefore, some hydrocarbon condensate is also removed during water dew pointing. The developed technique proposed in this study can be customized for the emerging marine transportation of gas in CNG form where the removal of heavier hydrocarbons might not be necessary and will be equally suitable for any other offshore/onshore natural gas production and processing including subsea production of oil and gas. This paper concentrates on the development of simulation techniques needed to accurately estimate dehydration efficiency to control hydrate in a supercritical flow using supersonic nozzles. A simulation model linked to a thermodynamic property generator is needed to predict the water removal efficiency under various flow conditions. The computer simulation results for water removal from a typical offshore natural gas stream under various conditions will be presented and compared with conventional techniques. Intensive water dew points down to about -50 to – 60 °C can be achieved without any cryogenic cooling or use of solid adsorption techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.138
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it