MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Association of DXA-derived Fat Mass Indices and Anthropometry with Blood Lipid Profile in Postmenopausal Women

2007· article· en· W1972291970 on OpenAlexaffabout
Hassanali Vatanparast, Jonathan P. Little, Shannon Duff, Denise Cornish, Stephen M. Cornish, Lisa Paus-Jenssen, Allison Case, H. Jay Biem, Philip D. Chilibeck

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBody Composition Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWaistBody mass indexMedicineInternal medicineAnthropometryEndocrinologyBlood lipidsWaist–hip ratioOverweightCholesterolBody adiposity indexClassification of obesityFat mass

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Our purpose was to determine whether dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-derived fat mass indices or standard anthropometry was better for predicting blood lipid profile in postmenopausal women. METHODS: Subjects were 437 postmenopausal women (age 58.1±6.4y). Fat mass was assessed at total body, trunk and abdomen (i.e. upper L1 to lower L4 and costal ridges) using DXA. Anthropometric measurements included body mass index (BMI), and waist girth. Blood samples were analyzed for total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL and LDL. RESULTS: BMI (kg/m2), waist girth and DXA-determined fat mass indices were significantly correlated with HDL, LDL, total cholesterol to HDL ratio, and LDL to HDL ratio. Among the indices assessed, DXA-derived, abdominal fat was the most predictive of the blood lipid measures, showing highest correlation coefficient estimates with triglycerides (r= 0.44, p<0.001), HDL-cholesterol (r=−0.44, p<0.001), LDL-cholesterol (r=0.14, p=0.05), total cholesterol to HDL ratio (r=0.45, p<0.001) and LDL to HDL ratio (r=0.34, p<0.001). After abdominal fat, waist girth had the next highest correlation with blood lipids. The results of regression analyses revealed that abdominal fat and waist girth can explain 20% and 16.5% of variation in total cholesterol to HDL ratio respectively. In sub analyses based on BMI groups, abdominal fat was the superior fat mass index for predicting blood lipid profile only in normal and overweight subjects. Among all indices, only waist girth had a significant correlation with total cholesterol to HDL ratio (r=0.21, p=0.03) in obese subjects. CONCLUSION: Among all DXA body composition or anthropometric measures, DXA-derived abdominal fat mass provides the most useful information regarding the risk of cardiovascular diseases through its relationship with blood lipid profile in non-obese postmenopausal women. Waist girth was the next strongest predictor of blood lipid status and is therefore a good measure in obese and non-obese postmenopausal women. Supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Saskatchewan

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.117
Threshold uncertainty score0.612

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicBody Composition Measurement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207