MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972315583 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.110907

The Influence of Uveitis on Patients with Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Disease

2011· review· en· W1972315583 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
J. T. Rosenbaum, Anthony S. Russell, Lyn Guenther, Hani El‐Gabalawy

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Rheumatology Supplement · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOcular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaWestern UniversityUniversity of Alberta
FundersAbbott CanadaCelgenePfizerGenentechAmgen
KeywordsMedicineUveitisDiseaseVisual acuityQuality of life (healthcare)PopulationClinical trialVisual impairmentImmunologyOphthalmologyInternal medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Uveitis, defined as an intraocular inflammatory disease, is one of the main causes of visual impairment in the working-age population. The condition often coexists with other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID) and greatly contributes to reduced quality of life (QOL) in affected individuals. While visual acuity remains the most commonly used measure of visual function in patients with uveitis, the US National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire is frequently used to assess their health-related QOL. However, despite intuition that coexisting uveitis might exaggerate already impaired QOL in patients with IMID, specific questions related to their visual functioning are rarely included in clinical trials or assessed in daily practice. We provide an overview of the occurrence and significance of uveitis in patients with IMID, its consequences, and the role of tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors in overall treatment approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2011
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Rheumatology SupplementSame topicOcular Diseases and Behçet’s SyndromeFrench-language works237,207