MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972346095 · doi:10.5555/2840819.2840933

Reducing Post-Silicon Coverage Monitoring Overhead with Emulation and Bayesian Feature Selection

2015· article· en· W1972346095 on OpenAlexaff
Ricardo Ochoa Gallardo, Alan J. Huy, A. Ivanov, Maryam S. Mirian

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Conference on Computer Aided Design · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVLSI and Analog Circuit Testing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObservabilityComputer scienceEmulationMetric (unit)Overhead (engineering)Bayesian probabilitySet (abstract data type)Data miningCoverage probabilityAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceEngineeringMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With increasing design complexity, post-silicon validation has become a critical problem. In pre-silicon validation, coverage is the primary metric of validation effectiveness, but in post-silicon, the lack of observability makes coverage measurement problematic. On-chip coverage monitors are a possible solution, but prior research has shown that the overhead is prohibitive for anything beyond a small number of coverage points. This paper presents a novel solution for post-silicon coverage monitoring: fully instrument the design in emulation to sample the relationships between coverage points, and then use this statistical data to choose a small set of coverage points whose coverage provides high probability that all the other coverage points are covered as well; only that small set is instrumented on silicon. To demonstrate the method, we propose a simple feature selection algorithm based on Bayesian networks to choose the small set of coverage points. In experiments emulating a non-trivial SoC, our technique reduces the number of coverage monitors by 92%, yet predicts over 98% probability that all coverage points are covered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Conference on Computer Aided DesignSame topicVLSI and Analog Circuit TestingFrench-language works237,207