Synthesis, Characterization and Ionic Conductive Properties of Phosphorylated Chitosan Membranes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Phosphorylated chitosan membranes were prepared from the reaction of orthophosphoric acid and urea on the surface of chitosan membranes in N,N‐dimethylformamide. Their ionic conductivity in the wet state was investigated. Chemical modifications contributed to improved ionic conductivities of the chitosan membranes. Compared to the unmodified chitosan membranes, it was found that hydrated phosphorylated chitosan membranes with an appropriate phosphorus content showed an increasing ionic conductivity of about one order of magnitude. The phosphorylation reaction mechanism was explained based on 13C and 31P NMR measurements. It was also observed that the crystallinity of the phosphorylated chitosan membranes and the corresponding swelling indices were changed pronouncedly, but these membranes did not lose either their tensile strength or thermal stability to a significant degree in comparison with the unmodified chitosan membranes. Possible reaction mechanism for preparation of phosphorylated chitosan membranes. magnified image Possible reaction mechanism for preparation of phosphorylated chitosan membranes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".