MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

<i>SCN1A</i> duplications and deletions detected in Dravet syndrome: Implications for molecular diagnosis

2009· article· en· W1972571437 on OpenAlexaff
Carla Marini, Ingrid E. Scheffer, Rima Nabbout, Davide Mei, Kathy Cox, Leanne M. Dibbens, Jacinta M. McMahon, Xenia Iona, Rochio Sanchez Carpintero, Maurizio Elia, Maria Roberta Cilio, Nicola Specchio, Lucio Giordano, Pasquale Striano, Elena Di Gennaro, J. Helen Cross, Sara Kivity, Miriam Y. Neufeld, Zaid Afawi, Eva Andermann, Daniel Keene, Olivier Dulac, Federico Zara, Samuel F. Berkovic, Renzo Guerrini, John C. Mulley

Bibliographic record

VenueEpilepsia · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersNational Health and Medical Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilSanofi
KeywordsMultiplex ligation-dependent probe amplificationDravet syndromeCopy-number variationGene duplicationGeneticsComparative genomic hybridizationBiologyEpilepsyExonGeneChromosomeGenomeNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the type, frequency, and size of microchromosomal copy number variations (CNVs) affecting the neuronal sodium channel α 1 subunit gene (SCN1A) in Dravet syndrome (DS), other epileptic encephalopathies, and generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (GEFS+). METHODS: Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) was applied to detect SCN1A CNVs among 289 cases (126 DS, 97 GEFS+, and 66 with other phenotypes). CNVs extending beyond SCN1A were further characterized by comparative genome hybridization (array CGH). RESULTS: Novel SCN1A CNVs were found in 12.5% of DS patients where sequence-based mutations had been excluded. We identified the first partial SCN1A duplications in two siblings with typical DS and in a patient with early-onset symptomatic generalized epilepsy. In addition, a patient with DS had a partial SCN1A amplification of 5-6 copies. The remaining CNVs abnormalities were four partial and nine whole SCN1A deletions involving contiguous genes. Two CNVs (a partial SCN1A deletion and a duplication) were inherited from a parent, in whom there was mosaicism. Array CGH showed intragenic deletions of 90 kb and larger, with the largest of 9.3 Mb deleting 49 contiguous genes and extending beyond SCN1A. DISCUSSION: Duplication and amplification involving SCN1A are now added to molecular mechanisms of DS patients. Our findings showed that 12.5% of DS patients who are mutation negative have MLPA-detected SCN1A CNVs with an overall frequency of about 2-3%. MLPA is the established second-line testing strategy to reliably detect all CNVs of SCN1A from the megabase range down to one exon. Large CNVs extending outside SCN1A and involving contiguous genes can be precisely characterized by array CGH.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score0.504

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations172
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEpilepsiaSame topicEpilepsy research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207