Single-nucleotide polymorphisms detected in expressed sequence tags of melon (<i>Cucumis melo</i>L.)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A search was performed for single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) and short insertions-deletions (indels) in 34 melon (Cucumis melo L.) expressed sequence tag (EST) fragments between two distantly related melon genotypes, a group Inodorus 'Piel de sapo' market class breeding line T111 and the Korean accession PI 161375. In total, we studied 15 kb of melon sequence. The average frequency of SNPs between the two genotypes was one every 441 bp. One indel was also found every 1666 bp. Seventy-five percent of the polymorphisms were located in introns and the 3'untranslated regions. On average, there were 1.26 SNPs plus indels per amplicon. We explored three different SNP detection systems to position five of the SNPs in a melon genetic map. Three of the SNPs were mapped using cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence (CAPS) markers, one SNP was mapped using the single primer extension reaction with fluorescent-labelled dideoxynucleotides, and one indel was mapped using polyacrilamide gel electrophoresis separation. The discovery of SNPs based on ESTs and a suitable system for SNP detection has broad potential utility in melon genome mapping.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it