MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972616047 · doi:10.5558/tfc82844-6

Post-harvest nitrogen cycling in clearcut and alternative silvicultural systems in a montane forest in coastal British Columbia

2006· article· en· W1972616047 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Brian Titus, Cindy E. Prescott, D. G. Maynard, Alan K. Mitchell, Robert L. Bradley, M. Feller, William J. Beese, Ross Benton, John P Senyk, B. J. Hawkins, Ross Koppenaa

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Forestry Chronicle · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsWestern Forest ProductsUniversity of VictoriaUniversité de SherbrookeNatural Resources CanadaUniversity of British ColumbiaCanadian Sport Centre PacificCanadian Forest Service
FundersNatural Resources CanadaUniversity of British Columbia
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceMineralization (soil science)CyclingForest floorNitrateNitrogen cycleNitrogenNutrient cycleAgronomyGrowing seasonClearcuttingOrganic matterNutrientForestryEcologyChemistrySoil waterBiologyGeographySoil science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The MASS (Montane Alternative Silvicultural Systems) trial was established in the coastal mountains of British Columbia to compare clearcut, patch cut, green tree and shelterwood systems. A number of studies were carried out at the MASS trial to determine the extent to which these variable levels of stand retention retained old-growth attributes of N cycling and associated ecological processes. Harvesting led to increases in N mineralization in the forest floor (2×) and mineral soil (10×), and fluxes of N through the upper 25 cm of mineral soil (2× to 3×). However, fluxes of N were not large (< 0.35 kg ha -1 per growing season). Nitrogen mineralized was predominantly ammonium and not nitrate in the forest floor (> 95% in all but clearcut, > 75% in clearcut) and upper mineral soil horizon (42–86%). The nitrate component came from heterotrophic decomposition of organic matter, not conversion of ammonium to nitrate by autotrophs, and nitrate increases resulted from decreased gross nitrate consumption with harvesting, rather than increased nitrate production. The increases in soil N availability resulting from harvesting were reflected in only slight increases in seedling foliar N concentrations for two to four years after logging (peak of ~ 2% for western hemlock and ~ 1.6% for amabilis fir) before decreasing to below deficiency thresholds for both species. Overall, estimated losses of N from the rooting zone after harvesting (1 kg ha -1 yr -1 ) were minimal in comparison to estimated N inputs (4 kg ha -1 yr -1 ), N exports in logs at harvesting (250 kg ha -1 ) and soil reserves (11 400 kg ha -1 ). Although unlikely to affect future site productivity, losses of N could be reduced somewhat through the use of shelterwood harvesting. Key words: alternative silvicultural systems, variable retention harvesting, nitrogen cycling, litterfall, decomposition, nitrification, N mineralization, microbial ecology, leaching, foliar N, Abies amabilis, Tsuga heterophylla, Thuja plicata

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.269
Threshold uncertainty score0.287

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2006
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Forestry ChronicleSame topicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsFrench-language works237,207