Lineage-Specific Transcription Factors in Multipotent Hematopoietic Progenitors: A Little Bit Goes a Long Way
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Basal expression of lineage-specific transcription factors (TFs) in multipotent hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) plays a pivotal role in normal hematopoiesis. Indeed, the interplay between lineage-specific TFs and chromatin modifying or remodeling complexes allows chromatin modifications at specific hematopoietic loci and promotes transcriptionally prone conformations. During hematopoiesis, the expression of various lineage-specific genes can be preceded by their potentiation i.e., by chromatin activation, in progenitor cells. Gene potentiation appears to counterbalance epigenetic silencing of lineage-specific genes in early progenitors, while maintaining an accessible chromatin conformation in the lineage pathway selected. Herein, we discuss the impact of lineage-specific TFs on gene potentiation and priming in normal hematopoiesis, and emphasize the complementary role of locus control region (LCR) or LCR-like structures and promoter regions in gene-specific potentiation events.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".