Multiple Surface Plasmon Resonances and Near-Infrared Field Enhancement of Gold Nanowells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Arrays of Au nanowells (NWs) were fabricated by electron-beam lithography (EBL) and characterized by surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS). It is revealed that these Au NW arrays exhibit multiple SP resonances that can be tuned by adjusting the geometrical characteristics of the NWs. SERS activity of Au NWs was confirmed for a range of excitation wavelengths and a number of model compounds including rhodamine 6G (R6G), phthalazine, and single-stranded oligonucleotides. According to numerical simulations based on the discrete dipole approximation (DDA), SERS enhancement originates from high electromagnetic fields (hot spots) localized both inside and outside individual NWs. In addition, far-field intercoupling effects between NWs have been observed experimentally in arrays with subwavelength pitch sizes. We show that the SERS enhancement factors can also be tuned and optimized by adjusting the geometry of NWs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".