MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972714892 · doi:10.1063/1.4824104

Carrier mobility enhancement in poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-poly(styrenesulfonate) having undergone rapid thermal annealing

2013· article· en· W1972714892 on OpenAlexaff
Steven A. Rutledge, Amr S. Helmy

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicConducting polymers and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPEDOT:PSSMaterials sciencePoly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)Electron mobilityOLEDAnnealing (glass)Conductive polymerConductivityCharge carrierOptoelectronicsSpace chargeCurrent densityPolymerComposite materialChemistryPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The conjugated polymer poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) is subjected to non-adiabatic rapid thermal processing and exhibits an increase in conductivity through the film. Electrical measurements on an ITO/PEDOT:PSS/Al diode structure display a current-voltage relationship that correlates to space charge limited conduction with the presence of an exponential trap distribution, which is commonly seen in other organic media. With careful application of this current transport theory to the obtained experimental results, the root cause of the conductivity enhancement can be attributed solely to an increase in the charge mobility of carriers in the PEDOT:PSS film. In comparison to an untreated PEDOT:PSS film, processing at 200 °C for 30 s results in a 35% increase in carrier mobility to 0.0128 cm2 V−1 s−1. Values for other material characteristics of PEDOT:PSS can also be extracted from this electrical analysis, and additionally are found to be unchanged with processing. Hole concentration, effective density of states, and total trap density are found to be 7.4 × 1014 cm−3, 1.5 × 1018 cm−3, and 3.7 × 1017 cm−3, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations115
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicConducting polymers and applicationsFrench-language works237,207