MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972937834 · doi:10.1109/cca.2014.6981487

Robust H<inf>∞</inf> force control of a solenoid actuator using experimental data and finite element method

2014· article· en· W1972937834 on OpenAlexaff
Rana Tahmasebi, Hossein Vahid Alizadeh, Saman Rahimi, Benoît Boulet

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsActuatorSolenoidControl theory (sociology)Finite element methodController (irrigation)System identificationRobust controlComputer scienceControl systemControl engineeringEngineeringMechanical engineeringData modelingElectrical engineeringControl (management)Artificial intelligenceStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the robust force control of a solenoid actuator is studied. Such control problem is of interest in the study of gear shifting control in electric vehicles (EVs) equipped with an automated manual transmission (AMT). Experimental system identification together with the finite element method (FEM) is the approach considered in this paper to model the dynamic behavior of the solenoid actuator as well as the system uncertainties. Using experimental system identification, a dynamic model of the actuator is obtained and a nonlinear algebraic model of the electromagnetic force versus current and air gap is proposed. Using the properties of the magnetic materials and the geometry of the actuator, an FEM analysis is performed using Magnet <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">®</sup> - Infolytica software - to obtain the dynamics of the nominal system and verify the system identification result. Considering the inherent uncertainty of the physical parameter involved in the actuation system as well as the measurement errors, an uncertainty analysis is performed to obtain the dynamic uncertainty model of the solenoid system. Moreover, considering the application of such actuator in the gear shifting process, the closed-loop performance objectives are defined with respect to the desired gear shifting quality. Knowing both the nominal system model and the uncertainty model, an H <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">∞</sub> robust controller is designed. The performance of the resulting robust closed-loop control system is examined for the nominal and perturbed systems and is shown to satisfy the objectives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.865
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydraulic and Pneumatic SystemsFrench-language works237,207