MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972951695 · doi:10.1021/la0616045

Botryoidal Assembly of Cholesteryl−Pullulan/Poly(<i>N</i>-isopropylacrylamide) Nanogels

2006· article· en· W1972951695 on OpenAlexaff
Nobuyuki Morimoto, Françoise M. Winnik, Kazunari Akiyoshi

Bibliographic record

VenueLangmuir · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPullulanPoly(N-isopropylacrylamide)CopolymerHydrodynamic radiusPolymer chemistryChemistryRadical initiatorNanogelMorphology (biology)Lower critical solution temperatureNanoparticleChemical engineeringMaterials scienceNanotechnologyOrganic chemistryPolymerDrug deliveryPolysaccharide

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hybrid nanogels consisting of cholesteryl-modified pullulan (CHP) and poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) were synthesized by graft free-radical copolymerization of N-isopropylacrylamide (NIPAM) onto methacryloyl-substituted CHP nanogels (CHPMA) in water at 50 degrees C in the presence of a water-soluble free radical initiator. Depending on the initial NIPAM/CHPMA ratio, CHP-PNIPAM (CN) nanogels containing 30.8-84.8 wt % PNIPAM were obtained in the form of self-assembled nanoparticles with a hydrodynamic radius (Rh) of 69.0-116.0 nm in water kept at 20 degrees C. Hybrid nanogels of sufficiently high NIPAM content, such as the sample CN90, which contains 79.6 wt % NIPAM, exhibited a two-step response to changes in solution (3 mg/mL) temperature: a decrease in Rh from 93 to 57 nm as the temperature increased from 20 to 35 degrees C, followed by a sharp increase in Rh from 57 nm to 90 nm at 55 degrees C. Both steps in this temperature response were reversible. The multistep response to temperature of the CN nanogels was attributed to the morphology of the nanogels, which are seen as consisting of grape-like (botryoidal) clusters of associated native nanogels held together via cholesteryl cross-linking points and held together by the grafted PNIPAM chains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score0.742

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLangmuirSame topicHydrogels: synthesis, properties, applicationsFrench-language works237,207