Plastic and adaptive response to weather events: a pilot study in a maritime pine tree ring
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work proposes a novel approach to describing intraring wood density characteristics as functions of annual weather events. This approach was tested using three different maritime pine clonal experiments, in which X-ray microdensitometry has revealed conspicuous within-ring patterns affecting most of the trees in 1996. This pattern has been interpreted as the variation of tree response to weather-controlled changes of water balance during the 1996 growing season. The level of tree response was estimated using an original norm of reaction obtained from the microdensity profiles. A 1996 site drought index profile was synchronized with the 1996 microdensity profile by pairing conspicuous points of abrupt change in both profiles (breakpoints). Regression of density breakpoints on drought breakpoints describes the norm of reaction of radial increment to water availability, and the plasticity of radial increment to changes in soil moisture is described by the slope of the regression. The slope showed moderate levels of genetic control that depended on the site and could potentially be used as criteria for the evaluation of tree adaptation to weather.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".