MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972967950 · doi:10.1080/15325000802258067

A New Wavelet-based Speed Controller for Induction Motor Drives

2008· article· en· W1972967950 on OpenAlexaff
M. Abdesh Khan, M.A. Rahman

Bibliographic record

VenueElectric Power Components and Systems · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSensorless Control of Electric Motors
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Induction motorVector controlRobustness (evolution)Controller (irrigation)Electronic speed controlControl engineeringTorqueEngineeringDSPACEComputer scienceAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents a novel speed controller based on multi-resolution decomposition analysis of the discrete wavelet transform for vector-controlled induction motor drives. The field-oriented control principle is used to decouple the flux and torque components of the induction motor dynamics. In the proposed controller, the discrete wavelet transform is used to decompose the speed error between the actual and command speeds at various scales. The control signal is generated using the wavelet-transformed coefficients of speed error of different scales. It has been found that these coefficients can represent the cumulative effect of motor drive uncertainties such as parameter variations, measurement noise, frictional variation, and external torque disturbances. The performance of this controller is evaluated in both simulation and experiments. The complete vector-control scheme incorporating the proposed controller is successfully implemented in real time using the ds1102 digital signal processor board (dSPACE, GmbH, Paderborn, Germany) for the laboratory 1-hp induction motor. The experimental results validate the robustness and, hence, justify the applicability of the proposed controller for the induction motor drive to be used in high-performance drive applications. In order to prove the superiority of the proposed controller, a comparison between the proposed and the conventional proportional-integral and proportional-integral-derivative controller-based systems is made at different dynamic operating conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectric Power Components and SystemsSame topicSensorless Control of Electric MotorsFrench-language works237,207