Energy harvesting from a vortex ring impinging on an annular ionic polymer metal composite
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The energy exchange between a vortex ring and an annular ionic polymer metal composite (IPMC) plate is explored during impact. The vortex ring axis of symmetry is aligned with the geometric center of the annulus, and the ring radius is slightly larger than the hole in the structure. Experimental results show that as the vortex ring approaches the IPMC, the plate initially deflects towards the approaching ring. Upon impact, the plate is pushed away from the impacting vortex ring, while a secondary vortex ring is formed at the edge of the hole, which subsequently propagates away from the IPMC. The mechanical strain of the plate during the impact results in a current through the IPMC, which is measured in order to estimate the energy harvesting capacity of this configuration. This preliminary study suggests that of the initial vortex ring energy can be transduced into electrical energy. An analytical model is developed to assess the energy harvesting capacity as a function of the vortex ring circulation. The model is in good agreement with experimental results, and shows a direct proportionality between the vortex ring circulation and the energy generated by the IPMC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".