Preliminary Investigation of Direct Injection Neat n-Butanol in a Diesel Engine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The characteristics of combustion, emissions, and thermal efficiency of a diesel engine with direct injection neat n-butanol were investigated. Tests were conducted on a single cylinder water-cooled four stroke direct injection diesel engine. The engine ran at a load of 6.5 ∼ 8.0 bar IMEP at 1500 rpm engine speed and the injection pressure was controlled to 900 bar. The intake boost pressure, injection timing and EGR rate were adjusted to investigate the engine performance. The test results showed that significantly longer ignition delays were possible when using butanol compared to diesel fuel. Butanol usage generally led to a rapid heat release in a short period, resulting in excessively high pressure rise rate. The pressure rise rate was reduced by retarding the injection timing. The butanol injection timing was limited by misfire and pressure rise rate. Thus, the ignition timing controllable window by injection timing was much narrower than that of diesel. The neat butanol combustion produced near zero soot and very low NOx emissions even at low EGR rate. The tests demonstrated that neat butanol had the potential to achieve ultra-low emissions. However, challenges related to reducing the pressure rise rate and improving the ignition controllability were identified.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".