Individual Interactions of the b Subunits within the Stator of the Escherichia coli ATP Synthase*
Bibliographic record
Abstract
F O F 1 ATP synthases are rotary nanomotors that couple proton translocation across biological membranes to the synthesis/hydrolysis of ATP. During catalysis, the peripheral stalk, composed of two b subunits and subunit δ in Escherichia coli , counteracts the torque generated by the rotation of the central stalk. Here we characterize individual interactions of the b subunits within the stator by use of monoclonal antibodies and nearest neighbor analyses via intersubunit disulfide bond formation. Antibody binding studies revealed that the C-terminal region of one of the two b subunits is principally involved in the binding of subunit δ, whereas the other one is accessible to antibody binding without impact on the function of F O F 1 . Individually substituted cysteine pairs suitable for disulfide cross-linking between the b subunits and the other stator subunits ( b -α, b -β, b -δ, and b-a ) were screened and combined with each other to discriminate between the two b subunits ( i.e. b I and b II ). The results show the b dimer to be located at a non-catalytic α/β cleft, with b I close to subunit α, whereas b II is proximal to subunit β. Furthermore, b I can be linked to subunit δ as well as to subunit a . Among the subcomplexes formed were a-b I -α, b II -β, α- b I - b II -β, and a-b I -δ. Taken together, the data obtained define the different positions of the two b subunits at a non-catalytic interface and imply that each b subunit has a different role in generating stability within the stator. We suggest that b I is functionally related to the single b subunit present in mitochondrial ATP synthase. Background: The peripheral stator stalk of Escherichia coli ATP synthase contains two b subunits. Results: Using disulfide bond formation, one b subunit was cross-linked to a , α, and δ and the other to β. Conclusion: The b subunits adopt distinct positions within the stator to generate stability. Significance: The different positions imply different roles in counteracting the torque generated by the rotor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".