MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973086215 · doi:10.4302/plp.2012.1.04

Measurement of high time-bandwidth pulses on a chip with SPIDER

2012· article· en· W1973086215 on OpenAlex
Alessia Pasquazi, Marco Peccianti, Roberto Morandotti, José Azaña, David Moss

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhotonics Letters of Poland · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Matter Interactions and Applications
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUltrashort pulseFrequency-resolved optical gatingPhysicsOpticsPicosecondOscilloscopeInterferometryPhotonicsPulse shapingOptoelectronicsBandwidth-limited pulseLaser

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We develop a method capable of characterizing both the amplitude and phase of ultrafast optical pulses with the aid of a synchronized incoherently-related clock pulse based on a novel variation of SPIDER. It exploits degenerate four-wave-mixing and its design is amenable for full ?on chip? signal characterization. By implementing our method in a CMOS compatible waveguide, we measure pulses with 1THz, and up to 100ps pulsewidths. Our novel reconstruction algorithm that we call Fresnel-Limited Extraction Procedure (FLEA), yields a time-bandwidth product (TBP)>100. Full Text: PDF References R. Trebino, "Frequency Resolved Optical Gating: the Measurement of Ultrashort Optical Pulses", (Kluwer Academic, 2002) [CrossRef] I. A. Walmsley and C. Dorrer, "Characterization of ultrashort electromagnetic pulses", Adv. Opt. Photon. 1, 308-437 (2009) [CrossRef] Nature Photonics Workshop on the future of optical communication,Tokyo, Oct. 2007. M. A. Foster et al.,"Silicon-chip-based ultrafast optical oscilloscope", Nature 456, 81-84 (2008) [CrossRef] E. K. Tien, X. Z. Sang, F. Qing, Q. Song, and O. Boyraz., "Ultrafast pulse characterization using cross phase modulation in silicon", Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 051101 (2009) [CrossRef] A. Pasquazi et al.,"Sub-picosecond phase-sensitive optical pulse characterization on a chip", [CrossRef] C. Iaconis and I.A. Walmsley,"Spectral phase interferometry for direct electric-field reconstruction of ultrashort optical pulses", Opt. Lett., 23, 792-794 (1998) [CrossRef] L. Gallmann et al.,"Characterization of sub-6-fs optical pulses with spectral phase interferometry for direct electric-field reconstruction", Opt. Lett., 24, 1314-1316 (1999) [CrossRef] C. Dorrer et al.,"Single-shot real-time characterization of chirped-pulse amplification systems by spectral phase interferometry for direct electric-field reconstruction", Opt. Lett., 24, 1644-1646 (1999) [CrossRef] D. Keusters et al.,"Relative-phase ambiguities in measurements of ultrashort pulses with well-separated multiple frequency components", J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 20, 2226-2237 (2003) [CrossRef] M. Hirasawa et al.,"Sensitivity improvement of spectral phase interferometry for direct electric-field reconstruction for the characterization of low-intensity femtosecond pulses", Appl. Phys. B, 74, S225-S229 (2002) [CrossRef] J. Wemans, G. Figueira, N. Lopes and L. Cardoso,"Self-referencing spectral phase interferometry for direct electric-field reconstruction with chirped pulses", Opt. Lett., 31, 2217-2219 (2006)Self-referencing spectral phase interferometry for direct electric-field reconstruction with chirped pulses [CrossRef] M. Peccianti et al.,"Subpicosecond optical pulse compression via an integrated nonlinear chirper", Opt. Express, 18, 7625-7633 (2010) [CrossRef] A. Pasquazi et al.,"All-optical wavelength conversion in an integrated ring resonator", Opt. Express 18, 3858-3863 (2010) [CrossRef]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.206
Threshold uncertainty score0.415

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it