MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Gillies Elevation and Percutaneous Kirschner Wire Fixation in the Treatment of Simple Zygoma Fractures: Long-Term Quantitative Outcomes

2008· article· en· W1973136057 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePlastic & Reconstructive Surgery · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFacial Trauma and Fracture Management
Canadian institutionsSaint John Regional HospitalDalhousie University
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsMedicineKirschner wirePercutaneousFixation (population genetics)SurgerySoft tissueInternal fixation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The objective of zygoma fracture repair is to restore preinjury function and appearance. The optimal surgical technique represents a balance between accurate fracture reduction and soft-tissue morbidity. METHODS: Fifty patients were eligible for review after treatment for isolated simple zygoma fractures using a combination of Gillies elevation and percutaneous Kirschner wire fixation between 1992 and 2003. Fourteen patients were available for examination at a mean follow-up of 8.7 years. Quantifiable parameters, including orbitozygomatic complex position, ocular globe projection, and infraorbital nerve function, were measured. All patients underwent qualitative assessment by independent, blinded observers. Negative soft-tissue sequelae were recorded. RESULTS: The mean differences between injured and uninjured sides of the face for malar eminence projection, height, and lateral position were 2.5, 2.7, and 2.3 mm, respectively. The mean difference in ocular globe projection was 1.23 mm. When these results were compared with those previously published for open reduction and internal fixation, no statistically significant difference was noted. The qualitative observers were able to identify the affected side 12 percent of the time. Other than a small punctate scar noted in one patient at the Kirschner wire insertion site, no other negative cutaneous or eyelid sequelae were noted. CONCLUSIONS: This study objectively shows that Gillies elevation combined with percutaneous Kirschner wire fixation provides facial contour restoration that is not significantly different from that of open reduction and internal fixation, with less soft-tissue morbidity. The technique is safe, easy to learn, and easy to perform, and should be considered in cases of isolated simple zygoma fractures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.492

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it