Regulation and functional significance of utrophin expression at the mammalian neuromuscular synapse
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is caused by the absence of full-length dystrophin molecules in skeletal muscle fibers. In normal muscle, dystrophin is found along the length of the sarcolemma where it links the intracellular actin cytoskeleton to the extracellular matrix, via the dystrophin-associated protein (DAP) complex. Several years ago, an autosomal homologue to dystrophin, termed utrophin, was identified and shown to be expressed in a variety of tissues, including skeletal muscle. However, in contrast to the localization of dystrophin in extrajunctional regions of muscle fibers, utrophin preferentially accumulates at the postsynaptic membrane of the neuromuscular junction in both normal and DMD adult muscle fibers. Since it has recently been suggested that the upregulation of utrophin might functionally compensate for the lack of dystrophin in DMD, considerable interest is now directed toward the elucidation of the various regulatory mechanisms presiding over expression of utrophin in normal and dystrophic skeletal muscle fibers. In this review, we discuss some of the most recent data relevant to our understanding of the impact of myogenic differentiation and innervation on the expression and localization of utrophin in skeletal muscle fibers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".