MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973165085 · doi:10.1080/15376520490429382

Incorporation of Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Data into Risk Assessments

2004· article· en· W1973165085 on OpenAlexaff
John C. Lipscomb, M.E. Meek, Kannan Krishnan, Gregory L. Kedderis, Harvey J. Clewell, Lynne T. Haber

Bibliographic record

VenueToxicology Mechanisms and Methods · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicPharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Canadian institutionsHealth Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysiologically based pharmacokinetic modellingIn silicoPharmacokineticsPharmacologyPharmacodynamicsRisk assessmentComputational biologyMedicineChemistryBiologyComputer scienceBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Risk assessment methodologies are being updated to allow the inclusion of numerical values for variance in pharmacokinetic (PK) measures and pharmacodynamic (PD) processes related to toxicity. The key PK measures and PD processes are identified from the results of carefully conducted and adequately reported studies. In some instances, studies with humans are not possible, and so the development of data useful for human PK evaluations and on PD processes in vitro or in silico represent an alternative. These results can be integrated under physiologic, anatomic, and biochemical constraints of the intact body through physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling. This manuscript presents the rational for and key considerations related to the inclusion of quantitative PK and PD data in assessing chemical risks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.038
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.063
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.200

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0380.063
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.147
GPT teacher head0.541
Teacher spread0.393 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueToxicology Mechanisms and MethodsSame topicPharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismFrench-language works237,207