MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973170054 · doi:10.5860/choice.39-2998

Our common country: family farming, culture, and community in the nineteenth-century Midwest

2002· article· en· W1973170054 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueChoice Reviews Online · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrontierPoliticsHistoryCarrHistoriographyEconomic historySociologyArchaeologyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Our Common Country: Family Farming, Culture, and Community in the Nineteenth-Century Midwest By Susan Sessions Rugh. (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2001. Pp. xxi, 285. Illustrations, maps, appendices. $45.00.) Susan Sessions Rugh has written a book that stands at the intersection of several historiographical trends. David B. Danbom and R. Douglas Hurt (Born in the Country: A History of Rural America [1995] and The Rural West since World War II [1998], respectively) have brought renewed attention to rural culture. Andrew R. L. Cayton and others have written pioneering works on the Midwest as a region (The Midwest and the Nation: Rethinking the History of an American Region [1990] with Peter S. Onuf and The American Midwest: Essays on Regional History [2001] with Susan E. Gray). Among the new regional history, there is increased attention to the sectional origins of Midwestern settlers in Susan E. Gray's The Yankee West: Community Life on the Michigan Frontier (1996) and my own book, The Emerging Midwest: Upland Southerners and the Political Culture of the Old Northwest, 1787-1861 (1996). Much of this new literature is situated in Illinois, beginning with John Mack Faragher's classic Sugar Creek: Life on the Illinois Prairie (1986) and including works by Kay J. Carr (Belleville, Ottawa, and Galesburg: Community and Democracy on the Illinois Frontier [1996]), and Jane Adams (The Transformation of Rural Life: Southern Illinois, 1890-1990 [1994]). To all these trends, Rugh has responded. Her elegantly written and thoroughly researched book thus speaks to a number of different fields: rural history, midwestern history, and the history of Illinois. Rugh's examination of Fountain Green township in Hancock County, Illinois, is a case study with broad applications to the formation of what Rugh calls the agrarian myth (xv). Rugh traces the settlement of Fountain Green, the family farm culture established there by the first settlers, and the demise of that culture. Eroded by the market revolution in agriculture, the nationalism of the Civil War, and the triumph of middle-class urban values over those of the country, family farm culture was in retreat by the time Fountain Green's first settlers began dying in the late 1800s. The early chapters examine the varied migration streams-from New England, the South, the Mid-Atlantic states, and, eventually, Europe-that helped form the population of Hancock County. Despite their disparate origins, settlers shared a commitment to independent family farming (4). Regionalism manifested itself in settlers' preference for crops, spouses, and churches. By mid-century, residents of the township were choosing between self-sufficiency and increased reliance on the profitable, but risky, market economy. The choice involved changes in crops, the ability to pass on a viable farm to sons, and increased reliance on credit. Regional identities began to be subsumed by class and political ones as residents divided on whether to accommodate to the new market order by, for example, improving roads and schools. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.248
Threshold uncertainty score0.494

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0100.008
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChoice Reviews OnlineSame topicAmerican Environmental and Regional HistoryFrench-language works237,207