MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973183554 · doi:10.1088/2041-8205/725/2/l191

<i>SWIFT</i> STUDY OF THE FIRST SOFT γ-RAY REPEATER LIKE BURST FROM AXP 1E 1841-045 IN SNR Kes 73

2010· article· en· W1973183554 on OpenAlexaff
Harsha Sanjeev Kumar, Samar Safí-Harb

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal Letters · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Canadian institutionsResearch CanadaUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsMagnetarGamma-ray burstPulsarFlux (metallurgy)Black-body radiationSupernova remnantNeutron starLuminosityTelescopeSpectral lineObservatorySupernovaAstronomyGalaxyRadiationNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report the study of the short (32 ms) and first soft γ-ray repeater like burst observed from the anomalous X-ray pulsar (AXP) 1E 1841–045 associated with the supernova remnant Kes 73, discovered on 2010 May 6 by the Burst Alert Telescope on board the Swift γ-ray observatory. The 15–100 keV time-averaged burst spectrum is modeled by a single power law (PL) with a photon index Γ = 3.2 +1.8 −1.0 and has a fluence of 1.1 +0.4 −0.6 × 10 −8 erg cm −2 , a luminosity of 2.9 +1.1 −1.6 × 10 39 erg s −1 , and an energy of 7.2 +0.4 −0.6 × 10 36 erg. The prompt after-burst 0.5–10 keV quiescent spectrum obtained with the Swift X-ray Telescope (XRT) is best fit by an absorbed PL model with Γ = 2.6 ± 0.2 and an unabsorbed flux of 9.1 +1.2 −1.4 × 10 −11 erg cm −2 s −1 . To investigate the pre-burst 0.5–10 keV persistent emission, we analyzed the archival XMM-Newton observations, and the spectra are well fitted by a two-component blackbody plus PL model with a temperature kT = 0.45 ± 0.03 keV, Γ = 1.9 ± 0.2, and an unabsorbed flux of 4.3 +0.9 −1.2 × 10 −11 erg cm −2 s −1 . Comparing the Swift -XRT spectrum with the XMM-Newton spectrum, spectral softening post-burst is evident with a 2.1 times increase in the unabsorbed flux. We discuss the burst activity and the persistent emission properties of AXP 1E 1841–045 in comparison with other magnetars and in the context of the magnetar model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal LettersSame topicPulsars and Gravitational Waves ResearchFrench-language works237,207