MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973208281 · doi:10.1080/0954010021000096382a

Development of Monoclonal Antibodies Against Cry1Ab Protein from<i>Bacillus thuringiensis</i>and Their Application in an ELISA for Detection of Transgenic Bt-Maize

2002· article· en· W1973208281 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Uwe Walschus, Sabine Witt, Christine Wittmann

Bibliographic record

VenueFood and Agricultural Immunology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInsect Resistance and Genetics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Research Council CanadaBundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
KeywordsBacillus thuringiensisCry1AcGenetically modified maizeMonoclonal antibodyToxinGenetically modified cropsDetection limitBiologyAntibodyBacillalesChemistryTransgeneMolecular biologyChromatographyMicrobiologyBiochemistryGeneBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Several transgenic insect resistant maize varieties, commonly referred to as Bt-maize, express the gene for the Bacillus thuringiensis toxin Cry1Ab. As a method for the determination of Bt-maize, a sandwich-type ELISA for Cry1Ab was established. Monoclonal antibodies were developed by immunization of mice with trypsin-activated Cry1Ab. The secondary antibody was labeled with horseradish peroxidase, and 3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) was used as chromogene. The detection limit was 0.4 ng ml m 1 of Cry1Ab. No (Cry1Ac, Cry1C, Cry2A, Cry3A) or only little (Cry9C) cross-reactivity with other Cry proteins was observed. Furthermore, the assay was applied to protein extracts from maize powder containing different amounts of Bt-maize from three different lines (Bt-176, Bt-11 and MON810). Using 100 mg maize per sample and Tris-borate buffer for rapid protein extraction, the minimum detectable mass fraction was 0.10% for Bt-11 and 0.23% for MON810. In contrast, Bt-176 maize could not be detected due to the fact that the Cry1Ab gene is not expressed in seed tissue of Bt-176 maize.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFood and Agricultural ImmunologySame topicInsect Resistance and GeneticsFrench-language works237,207