Transient Efficacy of Octreotide and Pasireotide (SOM230) Treatment in GIP-dependent Cushing's Syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We studied a 55-year old woman presenting with features of Cushing's syndrome associated with metabolic abnormalities including severe hypertension and type 2 diabetes. Urinary free cortisol excretion was within normal limits, but an unusual diurnal cortisol rhythm was observed with low morning and high postprandial levels, associated with the absence of cortisol suppression after dexamethasone, suggesting the possibility of GIP-dependent Cushing's syndrome. The diagnosis was confirmed by further investigations, showing significant plasma cortisol responses after a mixed meal test and after oral, but not intravenous glucose administration, as well as ACTH-independent bilateral macronodular adrenal hyperplasia (AIMAH). An aberrant increase in cortisol was also observed after glucagon and terlipressin injections. The patient was first treated with octreotide 100-250 μg thrice daily for 6 months, then with the new multi-ligand somatostatin analogue (SOM 230) 450-900 μg twice daily for 3 months. Although inducing a significant acute suppression of post-prandial cortisol response, both drugs had no effects on the clinical and metabolic abnormalities associated with Cushing's syndrome and new tests performed at the end of each treatment period confirmed escape of post-meal cortisol suppression to therapy. The patient finally underwent a bilateral adrenalectomy, which markedly improved her medical condition and allowed in vitro confirmation by real time RT-PCR quantification of a high aberrant expression of GIP receptor mRNA in adrenal tissue. This case report illustrates the lack of sustained efficacy of somatostatin analogues on GIP-dependent Cushing's syndrome, independent of their affinity for the different somatostatin receptor subtypes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".