A Comparative Study on Conformation and Ligand Binding of the Neuronal Uncoupling Proteins
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mitochondrial uncoupling proteins of the nervous system (UCPs 2, 4, and 5) have potential roles in the function and protection of the central nervous system (CNS). In the absence of structural information, conformations of the hexahistidine-tagged versions of all five human UCPs in liposomes were investigated for the first time, using far- and near-UV CD and fluorescence spectroscopy. Highly pure UCPs 1-5 were reconstituted in detergents and stable small unilamellar vesicles, appropriate for spectroscopic studies. All UCPs formed dominantly helical conformations in negatively charged phospholipid vesicles (palmitoyloleoylphosphatidylcholine/palmitoyloleoylphosphatidylglycerol, 7:3 molar ratio). UCPs 2 and 5 exhibited comparable helical conformations with possible association in lipid bilayers, whereas UCP4 had a different helical profile that can be related to its less associated form. Interaction of reconstituted UCPs with GDP and GTP, inhibitors of the prototypic UCP1, was detected by near-UV CD and fluorescence spectroscopy, utilizing the sensitivity of these techniques to microenvironments around Trp residues close to the nucleotide binding site. Binding of UCP4 to purine nucleotides was also different from other UCPs. Binding of fatty acids, activators of proton transport in UCPs, to UCPs could not be unambiguously detected, implying a nonbinding conformation/orientation of the proteoliposomes. Interaction of CoA with UCPs was comparable to nucleotide binding, suggesting a possible binding of this molecule at the nucleotide binding site. Despite dissimilar primary sequences, neuronal UCPs share common structural and functional properties with UCPs 1 and 3, supporting a common physiological role in addition to their specific roles in the CNS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".