MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973268549 · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.31557

Delivery of rapamycin‐loaded nanoparticle down regulates ICAM‐1 expression and maintains an immunosuppressive profile in human CD34<sup>+</sup> progenitor‐derived dendritic cells

2007· article· en· W1973268549 on OpenAlexaff
Saswati Das, Azita Haddadi, Simona Veniamin, John Samuel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceDendritic cellCell biologyPLGAImmune systemLipopolysaccharideBiologyNanoparticleNanotechnologyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Immune responses of dendritic cells (DCs) can be modulated by delivery of adjuvants to alter their maturation profile. The purpose of this study was to generate DCs from CD34(+) cells of human cord blood and characterize the effects of poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA)-nanoparticle encapsulated rapamycin in generating an immunosuppressive DC. Expression of ICAM-1 (intercellular adhesion molecule), a key molecule in DC-T cell interaction was increased in mature DCs in response to lipopolysaccharide (LPS). When rapamycin was encapsulated in the nanoparticle to maintain DCs in the immature state, ICAM-1 expression was down regulated. When delivered in the free form, rapamycin did not alter the expression of ICAM-1. Cytokine arrays exhibited an immunosuppressive profile of various cytokines in response to the nanoparticulate delivery of rapamycin. In addition, RT-PCR data demonstrated the presence of toll like receptor (TLR) 9 transcripts, although our DCs are myeloid in nature. In summary, our study demonstrates that DCs may be rendered immunosuppressive upon delivery of rapamycin-containing nanoparticles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biomedical Materials Research Part ASame topicImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesFrench-language works237,207