MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973300455 · doi:10.1159/000212708

Age-Related Strain Differences in the Development of Auto-Anti-Idiotypic Antibody Regulation in the Splenic and Mucosal-Associated Lymphoid Systems

2009· article· en· W1973300455 on OpenAlexaff
Myron R. Szewczuk, Andrew Wade

Bibliographic record

VenueGerontology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicT-cell and B-cell Immunology
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpleenIdiotypeHaptenLymphatic systemAntibodyImmunologyBiologyInternal medicineEndocrinologyStrain (injury)MedicineMonoclonal antibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the present study, we examined the changes that occur with age in anti-idiotype-blocked, hapten-augmentable PFC in the mucosal-associated lymph nodes (MLN and BLN) and spleen of various strains of mice. 2-month-old 129/J, AKR/J, and C57L/J mice had a high percentage of hapten-augmentable PFC in their spleen, MLN, and BLN; however, by 6-11 months these values had declined considerably in the spleen, while mucosal values remained high. In contrast, 2-month-old C57BL/6J, DBA/2J, and C3H/HeJ mice had a low percentage of hapten-augmentable PFC in their spleen, MLN, and BLN; but by 6-11 months these values had increased considerably in the spleen, while mucosal values remained low. CBA/J and SJL/J mice maintained high and low levels, respectively, of hapten-augmentable PFC in their spleens, MLN, and BLN over the age span. NZB/BinJ mice were found to be low producers in the spleen, but high in the MLN and BLN at 2 and 6 months of age. These data indicate that there are strain differences in the development of auto-anti-idiotypic antibody regulation with age.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.951
Threshold uncertainty score0.532

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGerontologySame topicT-cell and B-cell ImmunologyFrench-language works237,207