MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973312776 · doi:10.1080/15287390600974593

Antinuclear Antibodies and Bromoxynil Exposure in a Rural Sample

2007· article· en· W1973312776 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Toxicology and Environmental Health · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunotoxicology and immune responses
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLogistic regressionGeeGeneralized estimating equationBody mass indexMedicineAnti-nuclear antibodyBromoxynilInternal medicineAntibodyImmunologyAutoantibodyBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Previous research suggests that farmers may have an increased risk of developing autoimmunity and that exposure to certain pesticides may alter immune function. Little is known, however, about the immunologic effects of farming and pesticide exposures. As part of the Prairie Ecosystem Study, associations between detection of antinuclear antibodies (ANA), an autoimmunity indicator, and exposure to the herbicide bromoxynil (3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrile) were investigated in a cross-sectional study of 208 residents (94 women, 114 men) of a cereal-producing region in Saskatchewan, Canada, during spring herbicide application, 1996. The ANA were assayed in serum by indirect immunofluorescence on HEp-2 cells. Bromoxynil was measured in plasma by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry analysis. Associations were explored between ANA detection and detection of bromoxynil in plasma, self-reported use of bromoxynil and other pesticides, farming exposures, gender, age, body mass index (BMI), and residency. The mean age (SD) of the participants was 50.8 (13.6) yr [women: 49.7 (13.5) yr, men: 51.6 (13.6) yr]. ANA prevalence was 37.5% (women: 39.4%, men: 36%,) at 1:40 serum dilution, 17.3% (women: 20.2%, men: 14.9%) at 1:80, and 10.1% (women: 13.8%, men: 7%) at 1:160. In the multiple-variable Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) logistic regression analyses, female gender was a positive predictor of ANA detection and gender differences were observed in the relative importance of other study factors. None of the variables examined in the multiple-variable GEE analysis were statistically significant predictors of ANA detection for women. For many of these variables, however, the point estimates for women are similar to those seen in men. For men, with adjustment for age, ANA presence was inversely associated with detection of concentrations of bromoxynil in winter or spring samples and recent occupational use of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, and the positive ANA predictors included having a BMI in the obese (BMI > 30.04 kg/m2) category, recent occupational use of trifluralin or fungicides, and current exposure to oilseed, poultry, or dairy production. The inverse association between ANA detection and bromoxynil exposure observed in farmers in this study is consistent with earlier empirical observations that certain pesticides may suppress immune function. Further research is needed to examine whether these findings are confirmed in other populations and to elucidate the biological mechanisms involved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.472
Threshold uncertainty score0.553

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it