MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973328792 · doi:10.1159/000236545

Biological Activity of Monoclonal Anti-ldiotypic Antibody Representing the Internal Image of the Major Allergenic Component of Lolium perenne Pollen

2009· article· en· W1973328792 on OpenAlexaff
Yvan Boutin, Marie Jobin, Denis Bernier, Jacques Hébert

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Archives of Allergy and Immunology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAllergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalCentre hospitalier de l'Université Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistamineIdiotopesIdiotypeMonoclonal antibodyAntigenImmunoglobulin EAntibodyImmunologyMonoclonalLolium perenneBiologyAllergenChemistryAllergyPharmacologyBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Upon immunization with an anti-Lol p I (major allergenic component of Lolium perenne pollen) monoclonal antibody, we have previously produced anti-idiotypic monoclonal antibody (A7H2) displaying some internal image properties. The present study was designated to evaluate the capacity of this anti-idiotypic monoclonal antibody to mimic functionally the antigen by triggering histamine release from basophils of patients allergic to Lol p I. Anti-idiotypic monoclonal antibody, as the antigen, could induce histamine release in a dose-response fashion in all of the atopic patients (6/6). The inhibition of this histamine release by the addition of the idiotype (290A-167) confirmed the specificity of the reaction. Binding inhibition of human IgE to Lol p I demonstrated that the anti-idiotypic antibody recognized an idiotope expressed in the antigen-combining site of IgE molecules. Altogether, these data confirmed the internal properties of our anti-idiotypic antibody and it can mimic the original antigen in its capacity to trigger histamine release.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.893
Threshold uncertainty score0.268

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Archives of Allergy and ImmunologySame topicAllergic Rhinitis and SensitizationFrench-language works237,207