Le rôle des chiasmes dans la naissance et la formation de la langue arabe
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le système syllabique Σ, de l’arabe, qui comprend les seules syllabes {Consonne-Voyelle} et {Consonne-Voyelle-Consonne}, a déterminé l’impossibilité, dans le fonctionnement de la langue, de l’opposition d’une consonne à une voyelle. Ce chiasme est à l’origine de l’organisation ancienne des langues sémitiques, régissant, jusqu’à récemment, la langue arabe. Ainsi, la langue arabe a construit son système de nomination sur des arrangements de consonnes, les racines de ses unités de nomination, et elle a fait de ses voyelles désinentielles les signifiants de ses fonctionnels primitifs, ses cas. On relève, parmi d’autres, le chiasme organisant le verbe en deux paradigmes, achevé et non achevé. D’autres encore ont dans la langue l’apparence d’un ornement. Ces quelques cas exceptés, c’est, dans le discours, hors langue – la systématique des langues est une systématique fermée – que la rhétorique trouve la liberté qui lui est nécessaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".