MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973383433 · doi:10.1139/g07-092

Molecular cloning and mapping of casein kinase 2 alpha and beta subunit genes in barley

2008· article· en· W1973383433 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kenji Kato, Shin‐ichiro Kidou, H. Miura

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPhytase and its Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCasein kinase 2BiologyComplementary DNAProtein subunitMolecular biologyGeneLocus (genetics)GeneticsHordeum vulgareG alpha subunitCasein kinase 2, alpha 1ChromosomeCasein kinase 1Chromosome 22Protein kinase AKinaseCell cycleCyclin-dependent kinase 2

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Casein kinase 2 (CK2) is a ubiquitous, highly pleiotropic, constitutively active, and messenger-independent Ser/Thr protein kinase. It is found in two different forms: the heterotetrameric CK2, composed of two alpha catalytic subunits and two beta regulatory subunits, and the monomeric CK2 alpha, consisting of the alpha catalytic subunit. In the present study, we isolated barley cDNA clones of the CK2 alpha and beta subunit genes, designated HvCK2A and HvCK2B, respectively. Chromosome assignment, using a set of wheat-barley disomic chromosome addition lines, and RFLP mapping, using two doubled haploid populations, showed that HvCK2A was duplicated on the short arm of chromosome 2H and the long arm of chromosome 5H (designated HvCK2a-2H and HvCK2a-5H, respectively), and a single copy of HvCK2B was located on the long arm of chromosome 1H (designated HvCK2b). A PCR-Southern hybridization experiment demonstrated that the HvCK2A sequence originated from the HvCK2a-5H locus, showing that at least HvCK2a-5H was expressed. The present cDNA sequences and genomic organization of the two subunits will facilitate further functional analysis of CK2 in barley.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score0.094

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenomeSame topicPhytase and its ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207