MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973435440 · doi:10.1002/ibd.21933

High-sensitivity C-reactive protein for identification of disease phenotype, active disease, and clinical relapses in Crohnʼs disease: A marker for patient classification?

2011· article· en· W1973435440 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lajos S. Kiss, Mária Papp, Barbara D. Lovász, Zsuzsanna Végh, Petra A. Golovics, Eszter Anna Janka, E.‐M. Varga, Miklós Szathmári, Péter L. Lakatos

Bibliographic record

VenueInflammatory Bowel Diseases · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMagyar Tudományos Akadémia
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineC-reactive proteinCrohn's diseaseGastroenterologyDiseaseProspective cohort studyAzathioprineClinical phenotypeInflammatory bowel diseaseCutoffPhenotypeInflammationBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: C-reactive protein (CRP) is a traditional nonspecific marker of inflammation, with Crohn's disease (CD) being associated with a strong CRP response. Thus far, no clear cutoff values have been determined. The authors' aim was to investigate whether high-sensitivity (hs)-CRP is useful for the identification disease phenotype, active disease, and relapse during follow-up, using a classification based on the hs-CRP value at diagnosis. METHODS: In all, 260 well-characterized, unrelated, consecutive CD patients (male/female: 120/140; duration: 7.0 ± 6.1 years), with a complete clinical follow-up, were included. Hs-CRP, clinical activity according to the Harvey-Bradshaw Index, and clinical data (disease phenotype according to the Montreal Classification, extraintestinal manifestations, smoking habits, medical therapy, and surgical events) were prospectively collected between January 1, 2008 and June 1, 2010. Medical records prior to the prospective follow-up period were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: In all, 32.3% of CD patients had normal hs-CRP at diagnosis. Elevated hs-CRP at diagnosis was associated with disease location (P = 0.002), noninflammatory disease behavior (P = 0.058), and a subsequent need for later azathioprine/biological therapy (P < 0.001 and P = 0.024), respectively. The accuracy of hs-CRP for identifying patients with active disease during prospective follow-up was good (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.82, cutoff: 10.7 mg/L). AUC was better in patients with an elevated hs-CRP at diagnosis (AUC: 0.92, cutoff: 10.3 mg/L). In Kaplan-Meier and Cox-regression analyses, hs-CRP was an independent predictor of 3- (P = 0.007) or 12-month (P = 0.001) clinical relapses for patients in remission who had elevated hs-CRP at diagnosis. In addition, perianal involvement (P = 0.01) was associated with the 12-month relapse frequency. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that hs-CRP positivity at diagnosis is associated with disease location and behavior, and in patients who are hs-CRP positive at diagnosis, is an accurate marker of disease activity and a predictor of short- and medium-term clinical flare-ups during follow-up.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations89
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInflammatory Bowel DiseasesSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207