Supramolecular Functionalization of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes with Conjugated Polyelectrolytes and Their Patterning on Surfaces
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The interaction between single-walled carbon nanotubes and two anionic conjugated polyelectrolytes, poly[2,5-bis(3-sulfonatopropoxy)-1,4-phenylene- alt -1,4-phenylene) sodium salt and poly[2,5-bis(3-sulfonatopropoxy)-1,4-ethynylphenylene- alt -1,4-ethynylphenylene] sodium salt, was investigated. It was found that the supramolecular polymer−nanotube assembly occurred efficiently and produced stable complexes that could be purified from excess free polymer in solution. These complexes were characterized using absorption spectroscopy, fluorescence spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, and electron microscopy. It was further found that patterning of these polymer−nanotube complexes could be accomplished by utilizing electrostatic attraction with a prepatterned, cationically charged surface. Patterned features were found to be electrically conducting with a measured sheet resistance value of 0.68 ± 0.01 MΩ for features having a thickness on the order of several nanometers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".