MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1973585101 · doi:10.1115/fedsm-icnmm2010-30805

Integration of a PDMS/SU-8/Quartz Microfluidic Chip With a Novel Macroporous Poly Dimethylsiloxane (PDMS) Membrane for Isoelectric Focusing of Proteins Using Whole-Channel Imaging Detection

2010· article· en· W1973585101 on OpenAlexaff
Seyed Mostafa Shameli, Çağlar Elbüken, Carolyn L. Ren, Janusz Pawliszyn

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsoelectric focusingCapillary actionMicrofluidicsCapillary electrophoresisBiomoleculeChromatographyDetection limitMicrochannelAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryResolution (logic)Isoelectric pointAnalyteElectrophoresisMaterials scienceNanotechnologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Capillary isoelectric focusing (CIEF) is a high-resolution capillary electrophoresis (CE) technique for separating zwitterionic biomolecules, such as proteins and peptides. In this method, by generating a stable pH gradient along the length of the capillary and under the influence of a constant electric field, samples can be separated according to their different isoelectric points (pI). For identifying the focused zones in CIEF, the whole column imaging detection (WCID) is more reliable than any other single point detection methods since it avoids the need of focused peak mobilization, presenting several advantages such as lower detection time, minimized peak dispersion and consequently higher resolution. Capillary-based IEF-WCID has been invented by Convergent Bioscience Inc. (iCE280 analyzer) for separation of proteins and biomarkers [1–2]. In the iCE280 analyzer, hollow fibers are glued to the capillary to separate electrolytes from the samples and a metal slit with a 65 μm opening is glued to the top of the capillary to improve detection sensitivity by blocking stray light. However, this method has several limitations because of the use of capillary such as low throughput, difficulty to be integrated with other separation modes and low detection sensitivity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications→French-language works237,207→