MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973586590 · doi:10.2136/sssaj2010.0059

Plowing a Poorly Drained Grassland Reduced Soil Respiration

2010· article· en· W1973586590 on OpenAlexaff
J. Douglas MacDonald, Denis A. Angers, Philippe Rochette, Martin H. Chantigny, Isabelle Royer, Marc‐Olivier Gasser

Bibliographic record

VenueSoil Science Society of America Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsInstitut de Recherche et de Développement en AgroenvironnementAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoil waterEnvironmental sciencePloughGrasslandAgronomySoil respirationOrganic matterTillageSoil organic matterSoil carbonBiomass (ecology)ManureSoil scienceHydrology (agriculture)ChemistryBiologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Managed grasslands are a predominant land use in northern temperate regions. They are often on poorly drained soils and contain large stocks of soil organic carbon (SOC). It is important to understand C dynamics in grasslands to better assess their role in regional C budgets. Two adjacent grassland plots, one amended with 100 m 3 ha −1 of liquid swine manure (LSM) annually since 1978, and another unamended were killed by glyphosate in the autumn or (i) left with vegetation intact. Those killed were either (ii) left as an undisturbed chemical fallow, (iii) plowed by full‐inversion tillage (FIT) in the autumn, or (iv) in the spring. Following the autumn plowing, we monitored CO 2 emissions from the fallow soil surface, CO 2 concentrations in the soil profile, soil temperature, and soil water content for 1 yr. Changes in soil aggregation, the light fraction organic matter, and microbial biomass were also monitored. Plowing decreased the total microbial biomass on average by 27 g C m −2 , the quantity of water‐stable aggregates by 7 to 12% and with it the concentration of light fraction organic matter. Respiration was also reduced by 142 g CO 2 ‐C m −2 by autumn‐FIT and 175 g CO 2 ‐C m −2 by spring‐FIT on unamended soils, and 90 g CO 2 ‐C m −2 by autumn‐FIT and 98 g CO 2 ‐C m −2 by spring‐FIT on amended soils. Regression analyses suggested that reductions in CO 2 emissions were due to the placement of surface SOC at depth where soil temperature and oxygen availability were attenuated. In these soils, the cool humid conditions at depth in the soil profile may act to counter‐balance the physical effects of tillage thereby preserving C deep in the soil profile. Effective calculation of C budgets and changes in SOC stocks depends on the ability to reproduce the interaction between climate, soil type, land use, and management action. A more complete understanding of the effect of management actions that modify the vertical distribution of biogeochemical (particularly organic C) and environmental parameters on soil respiration in poorly drained soils is required.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSoil Science Society of America JournalSame topicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsFrench-language works237,207