Proton Migration and Tautomerism in Protonated Triglycine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Proton migration in protonated glycylglycylglycine (GGG) has been investigated by using density functional theory at the B3LYP/6-31++G(d,p) level of theory. On the protonated GGG energy hypersurface 19 critical points have been characterized, 11 as minima and 8 as first-order saddle points. Transition state structures for interconversion between eight of these minima are reported, starting from a structure in which there is protonation at the amino nitrogen of the N-terminal glycyl residue following the migration of the proton until there is fragmentation into protonated 2-aminomethyl-5-oxazolone (the b(2) ion) and glycine. Individual free energy barriers are small, ranging from 4.3 to 18.1 kcal mol(-)(1). The most favorable site of protonation on GGG is the carbonyl oxygen of the N-terminal residue. This isomer is stabilized by a hydrogen bond of the type O-H.N with the N-terminal nitrogen atom, resulting in a compact five-membered ring. Another oxygen-protonated isomer with hydrogen bonding of the type O-H.O, resulting in a seven-membered ring, is only 0.1 kcal mol(-)(1) higher in free energy. Protonation on the N-terminal nitrogen atom produces an isomer that is about 1 kcal mol(-)(1) higher in free energy than isomers resulting from protonation on the carbonyl oxygen of the N-terminal residue. The calculated energy barrier to generate the b(2) ion from protonated GGG is 32.5 kcal mol(-)(1) via TS(6-->7). The calculated basicity and proton affinity of GGG from our results are 216.3 and 223.8 kcal mol(-)(1), respectively. These values are 3-4 kcal mol(-)(1) lower than those from previous calculations and are in excellent agreement with recently revised experimental values.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".