Where does social control end and social capital begin? Examining social space, conflict, and the politics of difference
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The intent of this paper is to widen understanding of social capital to incorporate not only the structure of relations between individuals but also the creation of space; not just the development of consensus but also a place for conflict; and to examine the creation of social capital in a way that also honours individual identity and acknowledges systemic oppression. Here, the structural discussion of social capital is augmented by an examination of power and human agency. This discussion helps to deepen understanding of three characteristics of social capital identified in the literature: that people who contribute to the development of social capital and people who benefit from it may be different; actions that produce social capital in one circumstance may not produce social capital in others; and people have uneven access to stocks of social capital. Where understanding of social capital began in network analysis and later took a cultural turn, this article adds a critical and psychological perspective. Résumé La présente étude reconnaît que le capital social n'est pas simplement la reconnaissance des relations individuelles, c'est aussi la création des espaces sociaux; pas simplement le développement du consensus mais souvent un endroit de conflit. L'aspect dialectique du capital social reconnaît que cette approche qui honore l'identité individuelle peu aussi crée une oppression systémique. Cette discussion structurale du capital social est augmentée par un examen du pouvoir et des acteurs sociaux. Cette approche nous aide à identifier les trois caractéristiques du capital social identifiées dans la littérature : les acteurs qui contribuent au développement du capital et les bénéfieurs peuvent être différents; les actions qui produisent le capital social dans une circonstance ne vont pas nécessairement produire les mêmes résultats dans d'autres; et l'accès au capital social est souvent limité à certain membre d'un réseau social. Au début, l'analyse du capital social fut inspirée par les reconnaissances des réseaux sociaux, ensuite venu l'analyse des systèmes culturelle, cet article ajoute maintenant deux autres perspectives, l'analyse critique et l'approche psychologique. Keywords: social capitalcommunityconflictdifferencepowerMots clefs: capital socialcommunautéconflitdifférencepouvoir
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".