Safety and efficacy of maintenance infliximab therapy for moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease in children: REACH open-label extension
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Assess long-term effects of maintenance infliximab therapy in children with moderately-to-severely active Crohn's disease. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: One hundred twelve patients with a Pediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index (PCDAI) score >30 received infliximab 5 mg/kg at weeks 0, 2, and 6 in the REACH study. Patients considered responders at week 10 were randomized to infliximab 5 mg/kg every 8 (q8w) or 12 (q12w) weeks. Patients who completed treatment through week 46, and who the investigator believed would benefit from continued treatment, could enter the open-label extension (OLE) and receive up to three additional years of infliximab. No hypothesis testing was performed. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT0020767. RESULTS: Sixty children entered the OLE: 33, 12, and 15 patients were receiving infliximab 5 mg/kg q8w, 5 mg/kg q12w, and 10 mg/kg q8w, respectively, at extension entry. Patients receiving infliximab for up to 3 years during the OLE maintained clinical benefit, with approximately 80% of patients consistently having no to mild disease activity per the physician's global assessment and very good to fair health in the past 2 weeks per the patient and parent/guardian global assessments. Patients with ≥1-year delay in bone age at baseline trended toward improvement in height during the OLE. Respiratory system disorders, most commonly upper respiratory infections, were the most prevalent adverse events reported; six (10%) patients had serious infections. CONCLUSIONS: Among children with moderately-to-severely active Crohn's disease who received infliximab for 46 weeks in REACH and then for up to 3 additional years in the REACH OLE, infliximab was effective in maintaining clinical benefit and was generally well-tolerated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".