Long-Term Outcome after Griggs Tracheostomy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate laryngotracheal stenoses in the long-term outcome after percutaneous tracheostomy. METHODS: Between 1997 and 2000, 162 patients were tracheostomized during their postoperative stay at the intensive care unit of the Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Heidelberg. Thirty-eight of 80 long-term surviving patients (mean follow-up: 22 months, range: 7-50 months) gave their informed consent to follow-up laryngotracheoscopy. By using this technique, we localized the tracheostomy site, evaluated the laryngotracheal morphology, and quantified laryngotracheal stenosis planimetrically. RESULTS: Clinically relevant stenoses were found in one patient. Another patient had undergone surgical revision of the percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) prior to our examination. The endoscopic examination revealed that 89.5% (34/38) of the patients exhibited tracheal stenosis, less than 25% without clinical symptoms. Despite endoscopic guidance during PDT, the location of the puncture site was found to vary greatly. Cricoidal lesions were identified in 15 patients. In only 12 patients (31.6%), the PDT had been placed at the optimal location between the first and the second tracheal ring. In these patients, we found the lowest rate of tracheal stenosis in tracheotomies without fractured tracheal rings. CONCLUSION: Since clinically relevant tracheal stenosis has been found to depend mainly on the puncture site of the PDT and tracheal fractures during PDT, we want to emphasize the importance of adequate endoscopic guidance during and the careful performance of the PDT. Further follow-up studies are necessary to improve and ensure the quality of PDT techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".